Lead generation and appointment setting, from one accountable team

    Splitting lead generation and appointment setting between two suppliers creates a gap where blame lives: the generator says the leads were fine, the setter says they were not. Running both stages in one team removes the argument, because the same people own the list and the meeting.

    This is the service where we generate the leads and book the meetings for you. Already have leads and just need them closed? See commission-only closers.

    Why splitting the two stages usually costs more

    When lead generation and setting sit with different suppliers, nobody owns the conversion between them. The generator is paid on volume, the setter is paid on meetings, and the number that matters — meetings from the list — belongs to neither.

    Combining them means the list gets rebuilt when it isn't converting, instead of defended.

    • One team owns sourcing, qualifying and booking
    • List quality is judged by meetings, not by record count
    • Feedback from calls changes the targeting the same week
    • One report, one point of contact, one accountable party

    How the two stages work together

    The sequence is deliberately boring, and the discipline is in doing all of it rather than the interesting parts.

    • Define the target and the disqualifiers with you
    • Build or refine the list against that definition
    • Open conversations across phone, email and LinkedIn
    • Qualify against criteria you signed off
    • Book, confirm and remind to protect the attendance and qualification quality
    • Hand over in writing, then feed call learnings back into targeting

    What we report on

    Reporting is against outcomes rather than activity: meetings booked, meeting attendance, and what happened after them. Activity volumes are available, but they are diagnostics, not the scoreboard.

    If your CRM can accept them, we log against your records so the numbers live where your team already looks.

    Engagement economics

    How appointment setting is scoped commercially

    Appointment setting is a distinct service with its own scope and its own commercial model, agreed in writing before work begins. It is not sold as a count of raw appointments, and it does not share the closer remuneration model.

    Closer remuneration

    Performance-led and tied to agreed closing outcomes. What triggers it, when it is payable and how refunds or early churn are treated are all written into the agreement rather than quoted as a standard figure.

    Pearl Lemon service fees

    Sourcing, placement, onboarding and ongoing management are Pearl Lemon services with their own commercial terms. They are agreed separately from closer remuneration, in writing, before the engagement starts.

    What you provide

    The offer and its pricing, the qualified conversations or pipeline the closers work, product and pricing answers during onboarding, CRM and calendar access, and one internal decision-maker.

    What Pearl Lemon provides

    Sourcing and placing closers, onboarding them onto your offer and qualification criteria, and managing the working arrangement and pipeline reviews within the agreed scope.

    Attribution and payment terms

    Which conversations and deals count, how they are attributed, and when amounts become payable are defined in the contract for your engagement. They are not fixed site-wide.

    No blanket statement covers every service. It would be inaccurate to describe all Pearl Lemon work as carrying no ongoing fee, as being remunerated purely from closed-deal revenue, or as economically identical from one service to the next. The arrangement for each service is set out in the written scope for that engagement.

    FAQs

    Frequently asked questions

    Check whether closers should work your pipeline.

    Use the qualification router first. Closer-ready companies continue to booking; pipeline-first enquiries go to appointment setting.